‘…whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord’s. For to this
end Christ died and lived again, that He might be Lord both of the dead and of
the living. Why do you pass judgment on your brother? Or you, why do you
despise your brother? For we will all stand before the judgment seat of God’
(Luke 5.31-32)
Is the Church a hospital or a gymnasium? Do you support science or faith in God? Is he an intellectual or athletic? Is she a Packers fan or a Pittsburgher? Are you ‘Confessional’ or ‘Missional’? Is church music traditional or
contemporary? Does your church teach
discipleship or evangelism? Are you a ‘sinner’
or a ‘saint’? Is God just or loving? Is He the Lord of the living or of the
dead? Can you ‘have your cake and eat
it, too’?
Must we always choose between ‘opposites’, or can
some things be ‘both/and’? Life is full
of things that are truly opposites - true ‘antitheses’. But we hear a lot of false antitheses too. We hear one thing pitted against another, not
always for good reasons, causing, in some cases, unnecessary conflict.
In rhetoric, a false antithesis is an example of a
logical fallacy. Although that may sound
rather academic, as it impacts everything from communication to cooperation between people, false antitheses are a serious matter, especially when they become the
conventional view of a society.
Perhaps you feel that false antitheses are be more
common in youth than in old age, but that, too, could be a false
antithesis. Older people can be as
polarized by a false antithesis as people of any other age. In my case, early in my career, I remember
being challenged to choose sides in a debate about whether the Church was a
hospital or a gymnasium.
Now, this many years later, I’m like ‘seriously’? Surely the church has aspects of both a
hospital and a gymnasium as does any health facility that includes both
clinical therapy and physiotherapy. What
both a hospital and a gymnasium have in common is that they both provide a safe
supportive place for healing and exercise.
Both of them exist for the benefit of those who use them.
We come to church as people with souls ailing from
sin and guilt. We go to Divine Services,
not as the “righteous who need no
repentance”(Luke 15.7), but as the sick, requiring divine healing through
the forgiveness of sins delivered in the Church by means of God’s word and
sacraments. As Jesus said, "Those who are well have
no need of a physician, but those who are sick.
I have not come to call the
righteous but sinners to repentance." (Luke 5.31-32)
At the same time, we also come to church, as God’s forgiven people –
sanctified as well as justified - to exercise those qualities as God’s holy
people, that we will need to have if we are to engage others in the wider world
effectively. Again, as Jesus said, “love
one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By
this all people will know that you are My disciples, if you have love for one
another.” (John 13.34-35).
So do we belong to the Lord while we are alive, or
only when we die? Beware of a false
antithesis. For, “…whether
we live or whether we die, we are the Lord’s”.
1 comment:
Jonathan,
I have long thought that the bigger problem is that we do not discuss precise things, Ken Schurb wrote about the church as hospital as apposed to gymnasium in the early 90's and he was adamant that healing yourself is not possible hence the church was not a gymnasium used for exercise. Which for that precise argument is true. For that reason we must be precise in our discussion. That said the genius of our theology is that we can state, with a straight face, we are sinner/saints at the very same instance. It comes from our ability to believe "both/and" is a solid way to do theology. The problem is that we have a number of our members who don't want to accept "both/and" they want answers to their questions not ethical answers like "both/and" propositions. I hope this speaks to the issue as I feel strongly that we need to be precise in our discussion but there really are times when it is "truly both/and" for the answer.
Randall Russell
Post a Comment